Insensitive Christians
I've been thinking about this one for a while, but never written it down. It has to do with a Christian quality I believe is too frequently overlooked or disregarded in the Church: sensitivity. I believe a lack of sensitivity is tied directly to an overdeveloped sense of Self and usually results in contempt. Here's an example:
I used to work at a big huge church somewhere and I directed the "show" on Sundays, which we called IMAG, or image magnification for the congregation and a live cut to DVD. I'd sit in a darkened room in the back of the church (the "production booth") with four or five other people ("technical ministers"). Many of these technical people were volunteers who simply wanted to "do something" for the church. This involved a great deal of turnover within the "tech team."
One week, a likely homosexual came to the booth to run the CCU's (camera control units), which meant three big knobs that remotely controlled the aperture on our video cameras. Not only was he probably gay, but this man was also African-American, making him one of a handful in the whole church (of about 2,500 weekly). He did his duty that week somewhat clumsily, and it was my job to sort of "disciple" him in the technical ways. I always tried to treat our service with a light heart and with some measure of joy, while certain others frequently treated their obligations with a dire dread of mistakes and extreme criticality. As such, I would try to talk to these passers-by and learn a little about them each week. This man was friendly but shy, a little nervous perhaps. At the end of the day I thanked him for his contribution and he left. No big deal.
When he had left, the floodgates opened, as if everyone had been holding their breath for hours, waiting desperately for a chance to unleash. There was talk about his apparent homosexuality. This was "verified" by another volunteer who said the church elders had gone to his home to investigate his morals (why they have not done the same with our senior pastor, I will never know). There they found some "questionable" videos and pictures (maybe he'd rented "Brokeback Mountain," I don't know) and asked him about his orientation. There was all manner of sentiments about how uncomfortable people had felt to be in his presence and the guy in charge even decided not to let him come back, uh, but only because he was pretty clumsy on the CCU's.
I sat there on the verge of tears and nausea all at once. "This is the church," I thought. "This is no 'ragamuffin gospel,' this is a gospel of judgment, intolerance, self-assurance and condemnation." I never saw the guy again in the control room. Whether I ever saw him again at church, I don't remember.
In The Divine Conspiracy, author Dallas Willard explains that Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount, exerts a great deal of energy to combat what is potentially humanity's greatest sin: contempt. He states bluntly: "It is not possible for people with such attitudes towards others to live in the movements of God's kingdom, for they are totally out of harmony with it" (154).
At All Saints Church in Pasadena, there is an environment of welcome for all peoples, even (gasp) homosexuals . I've sat right behind openly gay couples there, and I think: this is right. I'm not attempting here to defend homosexuality in all its forms, I'm trying to understand what the kingdom of God is like. In the Beatitudes, Jesus shatters his disciples' perceptions about who is welcomed into his kingdom: all of the lowly, dejected and rejected and lonely and contemptible people. The church is an assembly of sinners under the grace of Jesus Christ (right?). Shouldn't all the rest of us closet sex addicts and alcoholics and thieves and liars and fibbers and tax evaders and lazy people and judgmental people and porn addicts and racists and bigots and perfectionists and self-haters and so on understand best of all that a homosexual deserves every bit as much love as we deserve, not only from God but from ourselves? One of my favorite professors at Fuller, Dr. Stassen, claims that many problems arise within the church because there is not a deep enough understanding of sin.
To conclude, I think sensitivity is just another word for "other-centeredness," which may be just another word for "kingdom-centeredness." I pray that I and my fellow disciples would be a community of mutuality and grace, that we would "enter into" the tumultuous lives all around and let the bodily presence of Jesus--the church--embrace the most contemptible among us.
9 comments:
Wow, you never told me about this...it's amazing what some so-called Christians can do. It is incredibly sad that the focus of many is not on Jesus and others-but is rather on themselves and how they feel. If only we could take the time to understand one another in love--and more specifically the love that Christ exampled for us. Along with you, I wonder how that experience affected his faith? Thanks for sharing this.
Love,
your sis
I'm not sure the guy ever knew what people thought about him, though he surely must have had a guess. And I wouldn't call them "so-called Christians." These are legit Christians who need the accountability and discernment of fellow believers, just like everyone else. I'm not trying to argue that they aren't really Christians.
I understand you are not arguing their intents as Christians but none the less it is heart breaking.
Thank you, Evan, for reminding us once again how Jesus would approach sinners (that is, all of us): in simplest terms, he would love them unto repentance and into his kingdom. Sadly, it is often much easier to condemn than to accept, to cast out than to embrace. May God give us all the heart of Christ and the wisdom to know how to love as he loves.
I couldn't help comparing this with your descriptions of discussions with the LDS missionaries. Not that I think you were very "insensitive" with them as people. I do, however, feel your reactions were closer to these Christians you describe than the ideal you expected of them. That includes your reactions to Muslims. In other words, I am wondering if you have your own "percieved outsider" biases that starts when a person's "Christian of my own faith" ends.
You may have caught me there, jettboy. I've been undergoing a process or relearning the past few years. Maybe my categories are too narrow and selective. Again, I'll try to work on that in the future. I've been trying to eliminate the "perceived outsider bias" and maybe this is another step along the road to legitimate Christ-likeness.
What about those that did reach out to him. As you claim these people ran him off. But what about those who did reach out to Him. I have seen more often than not those who come out of a sinful background being Homosexual or many other types of sins they choose to believe they are not accepted even when they are. I wonder what we are doing aware that some people forget of the sins they are forgiven of to reach out to them. I want to believe there is a whole other side to the story of this man you speak of that you are not aware of. Maybe I'm an optimist of the Bride of Christ but ultimately I hang on believing, and Hoping.
I didn't say he was run off. I have no idea what happened to him afterwards. I have no idea if he ever felt victimized, I only had this one experience with him. But I agree that we should reach out to people who are marginalized.
"The church is an assembly of sinners under the grace of Jesus Christ (right?)." Yes, they are. But Jesus said to the woman living with the man who was not her husband that she was forgiven...and to go and sin no more. We are forgiven, but that does not mean we should take forgiveness as an excuse to keep living in sin, be that lying, stealing, deceiving, disrespecting parents, and (shock) homosexuality. Is it "right" that there were homosexuals that you saw it church? Sure. Is it still "right" that the openly homosexual couple in church are members and still living the lifestyle without the "go and sin no more"? I don't think so.
Post a Comment